Key Takeaways
- Zambia’s central economic weakness is the limited value captured from its labour, land, capital, energy and natural resources.
- Growth should be judged alongside output per worker, productivity per hectare, manufacturing value addition, formal employment, export diversity and real incomes.
- Agriculture needs irrigation, mechanisation, higher yields and agro-processing, while mining must support stronger local supply and processing chains.
- Energy, finance, technology, markets and industry-ready skills must work together if firms are to become more productive.
If Zambia is serious about changing the structure of its economy over the next decade, productivity must become a central pillar of economic policy. Debt, inflation, unemployment and the exchange rate demand attention, but beneath them sits a deeper problem: the country is not generating enough economic value from the resources it already has.
Growth is not enough
Zambia’s opportunity base is large. Copper anchors export earnings. Agriculture has room to expand production and processing. Water and energy resources can support industry. A young population can supply the workers, technicians and entrepreneurs needed for a more complex economy.
Potential, however, does not pay wages or finance public services. Those assets must be converted into competitive businesses, higher-value production, quality jobs and rising household incomes.
“Zambia does not lack economic potential. It has a productivity and value-capture problem.”
Kelvin Chisanga
What productive growth would look like
Agriculture must produce more value per hectare
Agricultural policy should move beyond counting planted land or headline harvest volumes. The sharper questions are how much output each hectare produces, how reliably farmers can irrigate, how much post-harvest loss is avoided and how much of the crop is processed in Zambia before it reaches the market.
Mechanisation, irrigation, extension services, storage and agro-processing can turn farming into a stronger source of income and industrial demand. Zambia’s agriculture and mining hub should increasingly be read as a value-chain agenda, not simply a record of raw production.
Mining must build more domestic capability
Mining remains indispensable, but the policy goal should be to retain more value within the country. That means deeper local supply chains, more processing where commercially viable, stronger links with Zambian engineering and service firms, and skills that allow local workers to move into technical and managerial roles.
The argument is not that every stage of production must be forced into Zambia regardless of cost. It is that the country should deliberately identify where local firms can compete, then remove the barriers that keep them out.
Energy must power production
New generation and transmission investment should be judged by what it enables. Reliable power should keep factories running, support irrigation, reduce losses for small businesses and make new industrial projects possible. Megawatts matter because of the productive activity they unlock.
SMEs need a route to become stronger firms
Small and medium-sized enterprises need affordable finance, technology, market access and predictable rules. Yet the goal cannot stop at loan disbursement or firm registration. The real test is whether businesses survive, hire, invest, enter supply chains and graduate into larger, more productive enterprises.
That same test runs through our analysis of why MSME policy should measure graduation and the role of MSMEs in broad-based income growth.
Skills must match the economy Zambia wants
Education and training systems should respond more quickly to demand from farms, mines, manufacturers, energy companies and digital businesses. Training that is detached from equipment, production processes and employer needs leaves graduates searching for work while firms struggle to recruit.
Measure the economy by what it produces
GDP remains useful, but it should not stand alone. Zambia needs a public productivity scorecard that follows output per worker, yield per hectare, manufacturing value addition, formal employment, export diversification and real household income.
- Output per worker: is each hour of work generating more value?
- Productivity per hectare: are farming methods raising yields and incomes?
- Manufacturing value addition: is more processing taking place inside Zambia?
- Formal employment: are productive firms creating stable jobs?
- Export diversification: is Zambia earning more from products beyond raw commodities?
- Real incomes: are households gaining purchasing power after inflation?
A decade of productivity
Solving the productivity problem would raise incomes, create jobs, expand exports and strengthen government revenue. It would also reduce the pressure to finance development through repeated borrowing.
The next decade should therefore be Zambia’s decade of productivity. Growth will matter, but the country must ask a harder question: how much lasting value are we creating from every resource we use?
Related reading
WARNING! All rights reserved. This material and all other digital content on this website may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed, in whole or in part, without the prior express permission of The Zambian Economist. Where permission is granted, the content must be clearly credited to “The Zambian Economist,” with “www.zambianeconomist.com” prominently displayed.
WhatsApp: +260775574228 | Email: info@zambianeconomist.com
© 2026 The Zambian Economist.
