Zambian kwacha banknotes. Grant receipts came in 67 percent below target in the first quarter of 2026, tightening the screws on a K253.1 billion budget. Photo: Images of Money via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- The 2026 Budget projected K12.1 billion in grants, but first-quarter grant receipts were reportedly 67 percent below target.
- Grants finance programmes in health, education and social protection, so shortfalls force delays, reprioritisation, higher domestic revenue effort or more borrowing.
- The core problem is budget predictability: a K253.1 billion budget cannot rest on external financing that arrives late or not at all.
- Analyst Kelvin Chisanga argues the answer is not chasing more grants but building domestic capacity to generate taxes, exports, investment and jobs.
- The piece connects to the stabilisation-to-productive-economics shift the Treasury has made its second-term theme.
Zambia’s grant performance in 2026 is a fiscal warning: the budget projected K12.1 billion in grants, yet first-quarter receipts were reportedly 67 percent below target. The gap matters because grants are not spare change in the Zambian budget. They finance development programmes in health, education and social protection, sectors where a delayed disbursement means a clinic waits, a school programme stalls or a social cash transfer slips.
By The Zambian Economist Analyst | Analysis by Kelvin Chisanga | Lusaka | 19 September 2026
Why the shortfall bites
The problem, as Chisanga frames it, is not simply that donors are providing less. It is budget predictability. When expected external resources fail to arrive on schedule, government faces four unattractive options: delay programmes, reprioritise expenditure, squeeze harder on domestic revenue mobilisation, or borrow more. Each option carries its own cost, and none is free.
A K253.1 billion national budget cannot sustainably depend on external financing whose timing and volume sit outside Lusaka’s control. That is the structural point behind the quarterly numbers. A budget built on uncertain grants is a budget that plans in pencil.
The domestic alternative
Chisanga’s argument is that Zambia must increasingly finance development through its own productive capacity. The list of engines is familiar: mining value chains, agriculture, manufacturing, tourism, energy, ICT and exports, alongside a stronger formal private sector and a broader tax base.
This is where the fiscal argument meets the trade argument. Zambia enters the second half of 2026 with a K30.1 billion trade surplus built on K194.7 billion of exports, but with an export basket still dominated by raw copper. A surplus earned on unprocessed commodities is revenue that world prices can take away. Value addition, in minerals and in agriculture, is what converts a good quarter into a durable revenue base.
The revenue side of that agenda is already in motion. The 2027 to 2031 medium-term revenue strategy and the consultation behind taxing the economy better rather than more both start from the premise Chisanga ends on: broaden the base by growing the formal, productive economy.
The shift worth watching
There is a echo here of the message Finance Minister Situmbeko Musokotwane has been repeating since his reappointment, that Zambia is moving from stabilisation to growth. Fiscal self-reliance is the next chapter of the same story. Stabilisation bought Zambia credibility with creditors and partners. The productive phase is supposed to buy independence from them.
Chisanga puts the objective plainly. The goal should not be to secure more grants. The goal is an economy capable of generating more taxes, exports, investment and jobs at home, so that a missed disbursement from a partner is an inconvenience rather than a crisis.
What this means for you
For programme beneficiaries: social protection, health and education budgets are the first to feel a grant shortfall. Watch the mid-year budget review for reallocations.
For taxpayers: if grants stay below target, the difference is made up by you, through higher revenue effort or borrowing that future budgets must service.
For businesses: the push for domestic revenue means the formalisation agenda will intensify. Firms already in the tax net should expect sharper scrutiny; firms outside it should expect invitations to join.
WARNING! All rights reserved. This material and all other digital content on this website may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed, in whole or in part, without the prior express permission of The Zambian Economist. Where permission is granted, the content must be clearly credited to “The Zambian Economist,” with “www.zambianeconomist.com” prominently displayed.
WhatsApp: +260775574228 | Email: info@zambianeconomist.com © 2026 The Zambian Economist.
Work With The Zambian Economist: Advertise With Us | List With Us | Submit an Article
