The Constituency Development Fund has grown into one of Zambia’s largest social spending programmes. With K30.6 billion in play and absorption running behind schedule, Kelvin Chisanga asks the question the 2027 budget cycle cannot avoid: is the money reaching the small farmers and vulnerable students it was created for?
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- The K30.6 billion Constituency Development Fund is back in focus as the 2027 budget cycle opens, after a year in which utilisation ran weak and slow despite plans for full absorption.
- The secondary school component alone carries K3.6 billion, which works out to about K31.0 million for each of the 116 rural constituencies.
- Skills development bursaries hold K4.8 billion, split between K3.1 billion for skills bursaries and K1.7 billion for the secondary school skill development programme, covering tuition and examination fees for vulnerable learners at TEVET institutions and other training centres.
- The Ministry of Community Development and Social Services has yet to demonstrate that the money is reaching small-scale farmers and vulnerable students in the quantities intended.
- CDF has grown 25-fold since 2021 to K40 million per constituency, and the 2027 budget discussions are already asking why absorption keeps lagging allocation.
The Constituency Development Fund no longer has a size problem. It has a delivery problem. As Zambia approaches another budget cycle, attention is turning to how the K30.6 billion allocation will be used, and the honest answer at this point is that nobody outside the district committees can say with confidence who is receiving it.
The stakes are ordinary in the best sense. This is money meant for access roads that work in the rain, clinics within reach, water points that function, and school fees paid for children whose families cannot pay them. When it stalls, the loss does not show up in a bond spread. It shows up in a classroom, a borehole and a harvest.
What the fund pays for
The fund operates through several components. The Community Development Project covers access roads, clinics, and water and sanitation. The Youth Development Corps takes young people into structured work. Alongside them sit the Skills Development Bursaries and the Secondary School Skill Development Programme, the two windows through which the fund touches households directly rather than through infrastructure.
The numbers attached to those windows are large enough to change outcomes at constituency level, which is precisely why they deserve closer scrutiny than they usually get.
The arithmetic per rural constituency
The secondary school component alone receives K3.6 billion, meaning each of the 116 rural constituencies is entitled to about K31.0 million. That is a serious intervention in a constituency where a rural day secondary school can run on less than that for a full year.
The skills development bursaries carry K4.8 billion, broken into K3.1 billion for skills development bursaries and K1.7 billion for the secondary school skill development programme. These bursaries cover tuition and examination fees for vulnerable learners at TEVET institutions and other training centres. For a trainee electrician or carpenter in a district town, this is the line item that decides whether the course happens.
Whether the entitled amounts leave the ministry, reach the constituency committees, and land with the named beneficiaries on schedule is a different matter, and it is the matter on which the fund should now be judged.
The absorption problem
2026 was supposed to be the year the K30.6 billion fund reached full absorption. Instead, utilisation has been weak and slow, and the 2027 budget discussions are already asking why. The question arrives at an awkward moment for the wider fiscal picture: as we reported from the 2027 Budget Hearings, Secretary to the Treasury Felix Nkulukusa has told ministries to do more with less, with K271.9 billion in projected resources stretched across arrears and competing priorities.
Slow absorption inside a tight budget is not a victimless administrative delay. Every kwacha that sits unspent at mid-year is a bursary not issued, a water point not rehabilitated and a contractor not paid, and it invites the Treasury to shave next year’s allocation on the argument that the money is not being used anyway.
Follow the audit trail
The oversight machinery exists. The Auditor General audits the fund every year, and we have set out in plain language how those audits work, from the growth of CDF 25-fold since 2021 to K40 million per constituency, to what the auditors look for at each layer.
The pattern that keeps emerging is not usually missing money in the dramatic sense. It is money that moves late, buys unevenly, or lands with the connected rather than the intended. As we argued in CDF Must Not Become a Blank Cheque for Infrastructure, similar projects across constituencies vary wildly in cost because no national benchmarks discipline the pricing. The same discipline gap applies to bursaries: without published beneficiary lists and disbursement schedules, there is no way to tell whether the vulnerable learners the programme describes are the ones actually enrolled.
What the Ministry should publish
The Ministry of Community Development and Social Services can settle most of this argument with disclosure rather than commentary. A constituency-by-constituency schedule showing funds released, funds spent, bursaries awarded, and projects completed against plan would let any farmer, parent or councillor check the fund’s story against their own reality.
For households hoping to access the empowerment side of the fund, the practical entry points are already documented in our guide to how to apply for CDF grants and loans, which covers the committees, the paperwork and the reasons applications fail. A fund this size works only when the people it targets know how to reach it.
Conclusion
The bursaries reach many Zambians, and the fund’s growth over five years has been genuine. But scale was this programme’s easy part. The question that should carry into the 2027 budget is the one the Ministry of Community Development and Social Services has yet to answer with evidence: is the money actually reaching small-scale farmers and vulnerable students in the quantities intended? Until that answer arrives in published numbers rather than assurances, the K30.6 billion will keep earning more scrutiny than results.
WARNING! All rights reserved. This material and all other digital content on this website may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed, in whole or in part, without the prior express permission of The Zambian Economist. Where permission is granted, the content must be clearly credited to “The Zambian Economist,” with “www.zambianeconomist.com” prominently displayed.
WhatsApp: +260775574228 | Email: info@zambianeconomist.com © 2026 The Zambian Economist.
Work With The Zambian Economist: Advertise With Us | List With Us | Submit an Article
